[Python-Dev] Re: Capabilities
Guido van Rossum
guido@python.org
Mon, 10 Mar 2003 10:40:30 -0500
Mon, 10 Mar 2003 10:40:30 -0500
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Capabilities
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Capabilities
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[Ping] > By the way -- to avoid confusion between "proxies used to wrap > unrestricted objects in order to make them into secure objects" and > "proxies used to reduce the interface of an existing secure object", > let's call the first "proxy" (as has been used in the "rexec vs. proxy" > discussion so far), and call the second a "facet" (which is the term > commonly used when capabilities people talk about reducing an interface). > We often talk about providing, say, a "read-only facet" on an object. Hm, I'm not sure I understand the difference between the two definitions you give. What does "making something into a secure object" mean if not "reducing its interface"? And what is the fundamental difference between a secure object and an insecure one? In my world view there's a gradual difference. The only truly secure object is None. :-) --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Capabilities
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Capabilities
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]