[Python-Dev] PyObject_New vs PyObject_NEW
David Abrahams
dave@boost-consulting.com
Thu, 13 Mar 2003 07:28:00 -0500
Thu, 13 Mar 2003 07:28:00 -0500
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PyObject_New vs PyObject_NEW
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PyObject_New vs PyObject_NEW
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thomas Heller <theller@python.net> writes: >> I don't think the macro versions should ever be used outside the core. >> Inside the core, it's safe. So I think the "doc bug" is that the docs >> mention PyObject_NEW at all. >>=20 > > Better to expl=EDcitely warn about them with a wording similar to that > from the section 9.2 Memory Interface: > > In addition, the following macro sets are provided for calling the > Python memory allocator directly, without involving the C API > functions listed above. However, note that their use does not preserve > binary compatibility accross Python versions [] and is therefore > deprecated in extension modules. > > Maybe 'and compilers' should be inserted between the []. I'm not in a position to decide which one of these is better. Thomas, maybe you should be submitting the patch? --=20 Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PyObject_New vs PyObject_NEW
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PyObject_New vs PyObject_NEW
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]