[Python-Dev] are NULL checks in Objects/abstract.c really needed?
Jeremy Hylton
jeremy@zope.com
13 Mar 2003 15:01:03 -0500
13 Mar 2003 15:01:03 -0500
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] are NULL checks in Objects/abstract.c really needed?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] are NULL checks in Objects/abstract.c reallyneeded?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 14:15, Raymond Hettinger wrote: > > > i had a quick look at Objects/abstract.c in 2.2.2's source. almost > > > every function there checks whether the objects it's passed are not > > > NULL. if they are, SystemError exception occurs. since i've never come > > > across such exception i've commented out those checks. > > > Unfortunately, this is part of the safety net for poor extension > > writers, and I'm not sure we can drop it. > > Can we get most of the same benefit by using > an assert() rather than NULL-->SystemError? No. assert() causes the program to fail. SystemError() raises an exception and lets the program keep going. Those are vastly different effects. Jeremy
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] are NULL checks in Objects/abstract.c really needed?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] are NULL checks in Objects/abstract.c reallyneeded?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]