[Python-Dev] python-dev Summary for 2003-03-01 through 2003-03-15
Zooko
zooko@zooko.com
Tue, 18 Mar 2003 07:44:47 -0500
Tue, 18 Mar 2003 07:44:47 -0500
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] capability-mediated modules (was: python-dev Summary for 2003-03-01 through 2003-03-15)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] python-dev Summary for 2003-03-01 through 2003-03-15
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
(I, Zooko, wrote the lines prepended with "> > ".) Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk> wrote: > > > No -- capabilities (as envisioned for Python) are references. Whether a > > reference to an object, to a bound method, or to a function doesn't matter. > > I should note that this is a new (and good) idea, not one that we've > previously expressed. And, of course, they are references with > restrictions, which will be spelt out in the PEP. Yes. It isn't that Brett missed something and I corrected him, it's that I just asserted an idea that hasn't previously been posted to the list. Is the python-dev summary allowed to describe ideas posted in discussion of the python-dev summary? ;-) Regards, Zooko http://zooko.com/ ^-- under re-construction: some new stuff, some broken links
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] capability-mediated modules (was: python-dev Summary for 2003-03-01 through 2003-03-15)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] python-dev Summary for 2003-03-01 through 2003-03-15
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]