Keyword-only arguments (Re: [Python-Dev] Efficient predicates for the standard library)
Greg Ewing
greg at cosc.canterbury.ac.nz
Mon Oct 6 20:38:28 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Oct 6 20:38:28 EDT 2003
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Efficient predicates for the standard library
- Next message: Keyword-only arguments (Re: [Python-Dev] Efficient predicates for the standard library)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gareth McCaughan <gmccaughan at synaptics-uk.com>: > >>>> def any(*iterables, pred=bool): > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > File "<stdin>", line 1 > > def any(*iterables, pred=bool): > > ^ > > SyntaxError: invalid syntax > > Aieee! I was so sure you could do that, I didn't bother > checking I was just thinking the other day that you *should* be able to say that. Any keyword arguments after a * arg would have to be specified by keyword in the call. So many PEP ideas, so little time... Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a | Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. | greg at cosc.canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Efficient predicates for the standard library
- Next message: Keyword-only arguments (Re: [Python-Dev] Efficient predicates for the standard library)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list