[Python-Dev] RE: [spambayes-dev] spambayes-checkins -> spambayes-dev, python-checkins -> python-dev
Kenny Pitt
kennypitt at hotmail.com
Tue Oct 7 11:01:23 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Oct 7 11:01:23 EDT 2003
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: [spambayes-dev] spambayes-checkins -> spambayes-dev, python-checkins -> python-dev
- Next message: [Python-Dev] RE: [spambayes-dev] spambayes-checkins -> spambayes-dev,python-checkins -> python-dev
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 07:41, Skip Montanaro wrote: >> Greg> On 06 October 2003, Skip Montanaro said: >> >> Maybe the Reply-To: for spambayes-checkins should be spambayes-dev >> >> (and similarly for python-checkins/python-dev). Can that be >> >> engineered through Mailman? >> [snip] > > IMO as an anti-Reply-to munger, I think this is one situation where > Reply-To hacking is perfectly legit. You don't want discussions on > -checkins, you want them on the discuss mailing list (in this case > spambayes-dev). MM2.1 can be configured to retain any existing > Reply-To fields so people who have to set this to worm around their > broken mail systems can still be coddled. > > python-devers and spambayes-devers, you vant I should do dis? > -Barry +1 -- Kenny Pitt
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: [spambayes-dev] spambayes-checkins -> spambayes-dev, python-checkins -> python-dev
- Next message: [Python-Dev] RE: [spambayes-dev] spambayes-checkins -> spambayes-dev,python-checkins -> python-dev
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list