[Python-Dev] Re: [spambayes-dev] Re: spambayes-checkins -> spambayes-dev, python-checkins -> python-dev
Barry Warsaw
barry at python.org
Wed Oct 8 00:03:04 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Oct 8 00:03:04 EDT 2003
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: [spambayes-dev] Re: spambayes-checkins -> spambayes-dev, python-checkins -> python-dev
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: [spambayes-dev] Re: spambayes-checkins -> spambayes-dev, python-checkins -> python-dev
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 22:22, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote: > Barry Warsaw writes: > > Unfortunately, Mail-Followup-To is neither standard nor widely > > implemented in mail readers. Too bad, it's a good idea. > > There'd be more motivation for mailers to support it if lists > generated it. Add it to Mailman, and you'll give mailer > authors/maintainers another reason to support it. ;-) Yeah, we've tried that with the RFC 2369 (List-*) headers for years and it hasn't seemed to work. Besides, the closest thing to a standard for Mail-Followup-To says that list servers should never set the header[1]. I support your efforts to fight the good fight though, by setting your MUA to add those headers. :) -Barry [1] http://cr.yp.to/proto/replyto.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20031008/2b8c66f5/attachment.bin
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: [spambayes-dev] Re: spambayes-checkins -> spambayes-dev, python-checkins -> python-dev
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: [spambayes-dev] Re: spambayes-checkins -> spambayes-dev, python-checkins -> python-dev
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list