[Python-Dev] RE: [Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Objects typeobject.c, 2.244, 2.245
Martin v. Löwis
martin at v.loewis.de
Thu Oct 9 00:40:30 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Oct 9 00:40:30 EDT 2003
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: RE: [Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Objectstypeobject.c, 2.244, 2.245
- Next message: [Python-Dev] RE: [Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Objects typeobject.c, 2.244, 2.245
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> writes: > Maybe PyBool_FromLong() itself could make this unneeded by adding > something like > > if (ok < 0 && PyErr_Occurred()) > return NULL; > > to its start? That would an incompatible change. I would expect PyBool_FromLong(i) do the same thing as bool(i). > Maybe a pair of macros Py_return_True and Py_return_False would make > sense? You should, of course, add Py_return_None to it, as well. Then you will find that some contributor goes on a crusade to use these throughout very quickly :-) Regards, Martin
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: RE: [Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Objectstypeobject.c, 2.244, 2.245
- Next message: [Python-Dev] RE: [Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Objects typeobject.c, 2.244, 2.245
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list