[Python-Dev] RE: [Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Objectstypeobject.c, 2.244, 2.245
Mark Hammond
mhammond at skippinet.com.au
Thu Oct 9 01:21:12 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Oct 9 01:21:12 EDT 2003
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] RE: [Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Objectstypeobject.c, 2.244, 2.245
- Next message: [Python-Dev] RE: [Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Objects typeobject.c, 2.244, 2.245
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > > Maybe a pair of macros Py_return_True and Py_return_False > would make > > > sense? > > > > Include Py_return_None, and a solid +1 from me (even if > that isn't how I > > would spell it <wink>.) > > How would you spell it? For some reason, I am somewhat conditioned to macros with all caps. So I would personally go for Py_RETURN_NONE/TRUE/FALSE But have no objection to any reasonable spelling. Mark.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] RE: [Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Objectstypeobject.c, 2.244, 2.245
- Next message: [Python-Dev] RE: [Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Objects typeobject.c, 2.244, 2.245
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list