[Python-Dev] decorate-sort-undecorate
Christopher A. Craig
list-python-dev at ccraig.org
Wed Oct 15 16:55:16 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Oct 15 16:55:16 EDT 2003
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] decorate-sort-undecorate
- Next message: [Python-Dev] decorate-sort-undecorate
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Aahz <aahz at pythoncraft.com> writes: > But in the discussion leading up to adopting Timsort, you (or Tim, same > difference ;-) explicitly said that you didn't want to make any doc > guarantees about stability in case the sort algorithm changed in the > future. I don't have an opinion about whether we should keep our > options open, but I do think there should be a clearly explicit decision > rather than suddenly assuming that we're going to require Python's core > sort to be stable. Yeah, that's mainly what I meant by my post. Currently if I want guarantees that the sort is stable on any future Python I have to manually DSU. If DSU is going to be internalized I'd like some way to guarantee stability (if that involves no arguments at all, great). -- Christopher A. Craig <list-python-dev at ccraig.org> "It's a fairly embarrassing situation to admit that we can't find 90 percent of the universe." Bruce H. Margon (astrophysicist)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] decorate-sort-undecorate
- Next message: [Python-Dev] decorate-sort-undecorate
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list