list.sort, was Re: [Python-Dev] decorate-sort-undecorate
Charles Cazabon
python at discworld.dyndns.org
Wed Oct 15 17:28:32 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Oct 15 17:28:32 EDT 2003
- Previous message: list.sort, was Re: [Python-Dev] decorate-sort-undecorate
- Next message: list.sort, was Re: [Python-Dev] decorate-sort-undecorate
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kevin J. Butler <python-kbutler at sabaydi.com> wrote: > > I think just about everyone gets tripped up by the "sort returns None" > behavior, and though one (e.g., BDFL) can declare that it is a less > significant stumble than not realizing the list is sorted in place, it > is a _continuing_ inconvenience, with virtually every call to [].sort, > even for Python experts (like Barry, not me). Sure. I regularly find myself wishing "foo.sort().reverse()" and similar constructions would work, even in-place. Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <python at discworld.dyndns.org> GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.ca/~charlesc/software/ -----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: list.sort, was Re: [Python-Dev] decorate-sort-undecorate
- Next message: list.sort, was Re: [Python-Dev] decorate-sort-undecorate
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list