list.sort, was Re: [Python-Dev] decorate-sort-undecorate
Michael Chermside
mcherm at mcherm.com
Wed Oct 15 19:20:05 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Oct 15 19:20:05 EDT 2003
- Previous message: list.sort, was Re: [Python-Dev] decorate-sort-undecorate
- Next message: list.sort, was Re: [Python-Dev] decorate-sort-undecorate
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
BDFL: > -1000. This is non-negotiable. Kevin Butler: > +1 > > Just 998 votes to go - nice to have a precise value on BDFL > pronouncements. No voting twice with bigger numbers! ;-) Make it <wink> 999 after my -1. Seriously, the BDFL isn't just making this up. Beginners would be tripped up by this ALL the time. People like me who move from language to language and can never remember which behavior goes with which language would be tripped up. Returning None prevents being tripped up. And the work-around is *a 2-line function*! Why can't YOU live with writing a 2-line helper function to save lots of frustration for those of us who might forget whether it's in-place or not? I'm not flaming you here, just trying to point out that the BDFL is *not* alone on this issue. Don't-all-dictators-hold-faux-elections-these-days lly, yours -- Michael Chermside
- Previous message: list.sort, was Re: [Python-Dev] decorate-sort-undecorate
- Next message: list.sort, was Re: [Python-Dev] decorate-sort-undecorate
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list