[Python-Dev] Re: accumulator display syntax
David Eppstein
eppstein at ics.uci.edu
Mon Oct 20 13:03:50 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Oct 20 13:03:50 EDT 2003
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: accumulator display syntax
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: accumulator display syntax
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <200310201640.h9KGe4I21305 at 12-236-54-216.client.attbi.com>, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > And in fact, I think that > > sum(x for x in range(10)) > > reads *better* than > > sum of x for x in range(10) > > and certainly better than > > sum of x for x in range of 10 I also think sum(x for x in range(10)) reads much better than sum(yield x for x in range(10)) sum(yield: x for x in range(10)) or even sum([x for x in range(10)]) (The yield-based syntaxes also have the problem of confusing the reader into thinking the function containing them might be a generator.) It is enough better that the "tuple comprehension" issue is a non-problem for me. I'm assuming this syntax would need surrounding parens inside lists, tuples, and dicts (to avoid confusion with list/dict comprehensions and for the same reason [x,x for x in S] is currently invalid syntax) but avoiding the extra parens in other contexts like function calls looks like a win. -- David Eppstein http://www.ics.uci.edu/~eppstein/ Univ. of California, Irvine, School of Information & Computer Science
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: accumulator display syntax
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: accumulator display syntax
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list