copysort patch, was RE: [Python-Dev] inline sort option
Phillip J. Eby
pje at telecommunity.com
Mon Oct 20 15:42:20 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Oct 20 15:42:20 EDT 2003
- Previous message: copysort patch, was RE: [Python-Dev] inline sort option
- Next message: copysort patch, was RE: [Python-Dev] inline sort option
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 12:24 PM 10/20/03 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > > > [Ian cites "preferably only one obvious way to do it" to justify a sort > idiom] > >That's one of the best ways I've seen this formulated. Does this extend by analogy to other requests for short functions that are commonly reimplemented? Not that any spring to mind at the moment; it just seems to me that inline sorting is one of a set of perennially requested such functions or methods, where the current standard answer is "but you can do it yourself in only X lines!". >If Alex's proposal to have list.sorted() as a factory function is >acceptable to the non-English-speaking crowd, I think we can settle on >that. (Hm, an alternative would be to add a "sort=True" keyword >argument to list()...) Wouldn't it need to grow key and cmpfunc, too?
- Previous message: copysort patch, was RE: [Python-Dev] inline sort option
- Next message: copysort patch, was RE: [Python-Dev] inline sort option
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list