Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Tue Oct 21 20:20:15 EDT 2003

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] closure semantics
• Next message: [Python-Dev] closure semantics
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

> Another idea: We could replace the function globals() with an object
> that provides __call__ for backwards compatibility, but also has a
> special __setattr__. Then global assignment would be 'globals.x = 23'.
> Would this be possible?

Yes, I just proposed this in my previous response. :-)

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] closure semantics
• Next message: [Python-Dev] closure semantics
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list