[Python-Dev] Re: Be Honest about LC_NUMERIC
Christian Robottom Reis
kiko at async.com.br
Tue Oct 21 21:43:46 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Oct 21 21:43:46 EDT 2003
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Be Honest about LC_NUMERIC
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Python-Dev Digest, Vol 3, Issue 59
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 12:22:59AM +0200, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > What happened to this PEP? I can't find it in the PEP list. Sorry, I've been completely distracted by real life, lately. I can put some effort into the text this week, but I'm not sure what I should do beyond sending the PEP to the list and waiting for comments (which were pretty sparse!) > Personally, I am satisfied with the patch that evolved from the > discussion (#774665), and I would be willing to apply it even without > a PEP. I would really appreciate a comment from Tim outlining his opinion (so I'm adding him to the To: list). Just to recapitulate, the patch Gustavo has posted doesn't use the thread-safe glibc functions, which means that we won't be safe from runtime locale switching. I suppose I should also point out that runtime locale switching is useful in certain obscure situations; for instance, formatting a number with periods grouping the thousands can be done by setting to the da_DK locale temporarily. Whether this hack is to be encouraged or shelved for something better is yet unknown to me, though. Take care, -- Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Be Honest about LC_NUMERIC
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Python-Dev Digest, Vol 3, Issue 59
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list