[Python-Dev] PEP 289: Generator Expressions (second draft)
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Wed Oct 22 11:07:50 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Oct 22 11:07:50 EDT 2003
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 289: Generator Expressions (second draft)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 289: Generator Expressions (second draft)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I probably missed it in this monster of a thread, but how do > generator expressions do this? It seems that they'd only make > reduce more efficient, but it would still be just as needed as > before. All we need is more standard accumulator functions like sum(). There are many useful accumulator functions that aren't easily expressed as a binary operator but are easily done with an explicit iterator argument, so I am hopeful that the need for reduce will disappear. 99% use cases for reduce were with operator.add, and that's replaced by sum() already. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 289: Generator Expressions (second draft)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 289: Generator Expressions (second draft)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list