[Python-Dev] Re: accumulator display syntax
David Eppstein
eppstein at ics.uci.edu
Wed Oct 22 12:23:43 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Oct 22 12:23:43 EDT 2003
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: accumulator display syntax
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: accumulator display syntax
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <16278.34154.245725.959203 at montanaro.dyndns.org>, Skip Montanaro <skip at pobox.com> wrote: [ re a long expression of mine ] ... > pos2d = dict([(s,(positions[s][0]+dx*positions[s][2], > positions[s][1]+dy*positions[s][2])) > for s in positions]) ... > pos2d = {s: (positions[s][0]+dx*positions[s][2], > positions[s][1]+dy*positions[s][2]) > for s in positions} > > The extra characters required today are less of a problem if the expression > is laid out sensibly. I have to admit, your indentation is better than mine, even if you ignore the problems caused by my using lines wider than 80 characters. But I still feel the second of your two alternatives more clearly expresses the intent of the expression. -- David Eppstein http://www.ics.uci.edu/~eppstein/ Univ. of California, Irvine, School of Information & Computer Science
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: accumulator display syntax
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: accumulator display syntax
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list