[Python-Dev] closure semantics
Jeremy Hylton
jeremy at zope.com
Wed Oct 22 12:54:20 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Oct 22 12:54:20 EDT 2003
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] closure semantics
- Next message: [Python-Dev] closure semantics
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> But all this is moot unless someone comes up with a way to spell this > that doesn't require a new keyword or change the meaning of 'global x' > even if there's an x at an intermediate scope (i.e. you can't change > 'global x' to mean "search for the next outer scope that defines x"). > > And we still have to answer Alex's complaint that newbies misinterpret > the word 'global'. I'm not averse to introducing a new keyword, which would address both concerns. yield was introduced with apparently little problem, so it seems possible to add a keyword without causing too much disruption. If we decide we must stick with global, then it's very hard to address Alex's concern about global being a confusing word choice <wink>. Jeremy
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] closure semantics
- Next message: [Python-Dev] closure semantics
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list