[Python-Dev] accumulator display syntax
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Thu Oct 23 00:25:49 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Oct 23 00:25:49 EDT 2003
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] accumulator display syntax
- Next message: [Python-Dev] accumulator display syntax
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > > pipe = source > > > for p in predicates: > > > pipe = e for e in pipe if ^p(e) > > > > Bah. Arbitrary semantics bound to line-noise characters. Guess what > > that reminds me of. :-) > > If anyone can think of anything less line-noisy, I'm > open to suggestions. The important thing is the idea of > explicitly capturing an enclosing binding, however it's > expressed. I think that no matter what notation you invent, this will remain an unpythonic thing. I can't quite explain why I feel that way. Maybe it's because it feels very strongly like a directive to the compiler -- Python's compiler likes to stay out of the way and not need help. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] accumulator display syntax
- Next message: [Python-Dev] accumulator display syntax
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list