[Python-Dev] Re: Re: buildin vs. shared modules
Terry Reedy
tjreedy at udel.edu
Thu Oct 23 01:25:25 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Oct 23 01:25:25 EDT 2003
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: buildin vs. shared modules
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Re: buildin vs. shared modules
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Thomas Heller" <theller at python.net> wrote in message news:65ihlodo.fsf at python.net... > The whole delayload/__try/__except stuff may be unneeded in 2.4, because > it will most probably be compiled with MSVC7.1, installed via an msi > installer, and all systems where the msi actually could be installed > would already have a winsock (or winsock2) dll. At least that is my > impression on what I hear about systems older than (or including?) > win98SE these days. There are a *lot* of Win98 systems that are not officially 'SE', although a lot of SE stuff has been added thru Windows Update. They are both newer and more numerous, I believe, than some of the other OSes supported. I would hate for Python to cease working on them. (I have one, and my wife three or four.) So I would hope that a C7.1 build is tested on such before an irrevocable commitment is made. Terry J. Reedy
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: buildin vs. shared modules
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Re: buildin vs. shared modules
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list