[Python-Dev] Re: let's not stretch a keyword's use unreasonably, _please_...
Barry Warsaw
barry at python.org
Thu Oct 23 09:22:41 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Oct 23 09:22:41 EDT 2003
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: let's not stretch a keyword's use unreasonably, _please_...
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: let's not stretch a keyword's use unreasonably, _please_...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 01:51, Terry Reedy wrote: > So I really *don't* need global. Perhaps a new builtin > > def me(): > import sys > return sys.modules[__name__] +1, or just "import __me__" I've often wanted a convenient way to get a hold of the current module object. I use something like def me(), but it's a bit ugly and magical looking. -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20031023/5aa0a928/attachment-0001.bin
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: let's not stretch a keyword's use unreasonably, _please_...
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: let's not stretch a keyword's use unreasonably, _please_...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list