[Python-Dev] Re: closure semantics
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Thu Oct 23 20:11:36 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Oct 23 20:11:36 EDT 2003
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: closure semantics
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Re: closure semantics
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[Tim Delane]y > Going on the principle of least surprise, I have to say that I think > explicitly naming the scope in which a variable is to be used is the > best approach. [...] > 'global x in func1' is also a *lot* easier to explain. > > I think these two points should weigh heavily in any decision. I > think the need to rename the target scope is of lesser importance. I have to concur. EIBTI. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: closure semantics
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Re: closure semantics
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list