copysort patch, was RE: [Python-Dev] inline sort option
Alex Martelli
aleaxit at yahoo.com
Sat Oct 25 09:08:15 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Oct 25 09:08:15 EDT 2003
- Previous message: copysort patch, was RE: [Python-Dev] inline sort option
- Next message: copysort patch, was RE: [Python-Dev] inline sort option
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wednesday 22 October 2003 08:53 pm, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > Did the discussion of a sort() expression get resolved? > > > > The last I remember was that the list.sorted() classmethod had won the > > most support because it accepted the broadest range of inputs. > > > > I could live with that though I still prefer the more limited > > (list-only) copysort() method. > > list.sorted() has won, but we are waiting from feedback from the > person who didn't like having both sort() and sorted() as methods, to > see if his objection still holds when one is a method and the other a > factory function. So, if I've followed correctly the lots of python-dev mail over the last few days, that person (Aahz) is roughly +0 on list.sorted as classmethod and thus we can go ahead. Right? Alex
- Previous message: copysort patch, was RE: [Python-Dev] inline sort option
- Next message: copysort patch, was RE: [Python-Dev] inline sort option
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list