copysort patch, was RE: [Python-Dev] inline sort option
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Sat Oct 25 18:25:22 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Oct 25 18:25:22 EDT 2003
- Previous message: copysort patch, was RE: [Python-Dev] inline sort option
- Next message: copysort patch, was RE: [Python-Dev] inline sort option
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[Alex] > > So, if I've followed correctly the lots of python-dev mail over the last > > few days, that person (Aahz) is roughly +0 on list.sorted as classmethod > > and thus we can go ahead. Right? [Aahz] > I'm not the person who objected on non-English speaking grounds, and I'm > -0 because I don't like using grammatical tense as the differentiator; > as I said, I'd expect sorted() to be a predicate. If we're doing this > (and it seems we are), I still prefer copysort() for clarity. But I'm > not objecting to sorted(). Predicates start with 'is'. For example, s.lower() converts s to lowercase; s.islower() asks if s is lowercase. I'm -1 on list.copysort() as a constructor/factory. Since whoever didn't like sorted() before hasn't piped up now, I think we should go ahead and implement the list.sorted() constructor. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: copysort patch, was RE: [Python-Dev] inline sort option
- Next message: copysort patch, was RE: [Python-Dev] inline sort option
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list