[Python-Dev] Re: closure semantics
Alex Martelli
aleaxit at yahoo.com
Sat Oct 25 19:31:47 EDT 2003
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Oct 25 19:31:47 EDT 2003
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: closure semantics
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: closure semantics
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Saturday 25 October 2003 06:09 pm, Skip Montanaro wrote: ... > I don't see this as a big problem now. In my own code I rarely use global, > and never use nested functions. I suspect that's true for most people. No doubt it's true that most people only care about their own code, and don't have much to do with teaching and advising others, mentoring them, maintaining and enhancing code originally written by others, etc. So, since my professional activity typically encompasses these weird activities, not of interest to most people, and that gives me a different viewpoint from that of most people, I guess it's silly of me to share it. Sorry if my past well-meant eagerness caused problems; it's obviously more sensible for people who never use nested functions to help shape their syntax and semantics, than for those who DO use them, after all -- and similarly, for people who only care about their own code to help determine if 'global' is, or isn't, a cause of problems out there in the wide world of Python newbies and users far from python-dev. Alex
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: closure semantics
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: closure semantics
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list