[Python-Dev] Let's table the discussion of replacing 'global'
Jeremy Hylton
jeremy at alum.mit.edu
Mon Oct 27 14:44:21 EST 2003
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Oct 27 14:44:21 EST 2003
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Let's table the discussion of replacing 'global'
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Let's table the discussion of replacing 'global'
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 12:29, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > I'm going to make a suggestion. Let's shelve this topic for the time being > > and simply summarize the issues in an informational PEP aimed at > > Py3k. > > Great idea. I'm getting tired of it too; Alex and I don't seem to be > getting an inch closer to each other. > > > We don't even know (at least I don't) if we want an implicit search > > for outer scope variables or an explicit specification of which > > scope such variables should be defined in. If, for some reason, > > nested scopes make a quick exit in Py3k, this would all be moot > > anyway. > > Sorry to disappoint you, but nested scopes aren't going away. I haven't had time to participate in this thread -- too much real work for the last several days -- but I'd be happy to write a PEP that summarizes the issues. Jeremy
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Let's table the discussion of replacing 'global'
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Let's table the discussion of replacing 'global'
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list