[Python-Dev] PEP 289: Generator Expressions
Alex Martelli
aleaxit at yahoo.com
Mon Oct 27 18:13:36 EST 2003
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Oct 27 18:13:36 EST 2003
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 289: Generator Expressions
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 289: Generator Expressions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tuesday 28 October 2003 12:10 am, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > Overall the pep is being well received. The discussion has been > > uncontentious and light (around 50-55 posts). > > Great! > > > There was occasional discussion about the parentheses requirement but > > that was quickly settled also. One idea that had some merit was to not > > require the outer parentheses for a single expression on the rhs of an > > assignment: > > > > g = (x**2 for x in range(10)) # maybe the outer parens are not > > needed > > I really think they should be required. The 'for' keyword feels like > it has a lower "priority" than the assignment operator. I entirely agree with Guido: the assignment looks _much_ better to me WITH the parentheses around the RHS. Alex
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 289: Generator Expressions
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 289: Generator Expressions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list