copysort patch, was RE: [Python-Dev] inline sort option
Alex Martelli
aleaxit at yahoo.com
Tue Oct 28 11:42:39 EST 2003
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Oct 28 11:42:39 EST 2003
- Previous message: copysort patch, was RE: [Python-Dev] inline sort option
- Next message: copysort patch, was RE: [Python-Dev] inline sort option
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tuesday 28 October 2003 03:01 pm, Phillip J. Eby wrote: > At 05:29 AM 10/28/03 -0500, Raymond Hettinger wrote: > > inlinesort() # immediately clear how it is different from sort() > > sortedcopy() # clear that it makes a copy and does a sort > > newsorted() # appropriate for a class method constructor > > +1 on sortedcopy(), especially if it's usable as a method, e.g. > myList.sortedcopy(). (Note that that doesn't exclude it also being spelled > as 'list.sortedcopy(myList)'.) Please explain how it might work when the argument to list.sortedcopy is *NOT* an instance of type list, but rather a completely general sequence, as a classmethod will of course allow us to have. Maybe I'm missing some recent Python enhancements, but I thought that, if a method is fully usable as an instancemethod, then when called on the type it's an unbound method and will ONLY support being called with an instance of the type as the 1st arg. Hmmm... maybe one COULD make a custom descriptor that does support both usages... and maybe it IS worth making the .sorted (or whatever name) entry a case of exactly such a subtle custom descriptor... Alex
- Previous message: copysort patch, was RE: [Python-Dev] inline sort option
- Next message: copysort patch, was RE: [Python-Dev] inline sort option
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list