[Python-Dev] Re: the "3*x works w/o __rmul__" bug
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Tue Oct 28 14:08:04 EST 2003
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Oct 28 14:08:04 EST 2003
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: the "3*x works w/o __rmul__" bug
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: the "3*x works w/o __rmul__" bug
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I know it's hard to fix (I've stared at that code for QUITE a > while...). But "deducing" from that difficulty that the error's not > worth fixing seems like a classic case of "sour grapes":-). I dunno. As language warts go I find this one minuscule, and the effort you spend on rhetoric to convince me a waste of breath. My position is: I understand that it's a wart, I just don't think I know of a good solution, and I can live with the status quo just fine. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: the "3*x works w/o __rmul__" bug
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: the "3*x works w/o __rmul__" bug
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list