[Python-Dev] Call for defense of @decorators
Gustavo Niemeyer
niemeyer at conectiva.com
Thu Aug 5 22:22:45 CEST 2004
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Aug 5 22:22:45 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Call for defense of @decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Call for defense of @decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > So they should defend @ because it's there. > > I hate repeating myself, but I will anyway. :) Thanks. > I'm in camp 2, but now that pie decorators are in, and I've had a chance > to convert my code to use them, I'm strongly +1 in favor of this > syntax. It stands out nicely, and to me indicates a stronger affinity > to the def that follows it than the C# syntax. I'm glad to see people happy with the current implementation. > I was never in favor of C# syntax, and I'm glad it wasn't chosen. I > strongly disliked that it subtly changed the semantics of currently > valid Python. I like that pie decorators code cannot run in older > Pythons, because if it /could/ it certainly wouldn't work. I'm strongly against "I'm sick of it" and "I don't care [anymore]" implemented features. Seeing everyone complaining and no positive reactions to the current implementation certainly feels like something is wrong. -- Gustavo Niemeyer http://niemeyer.net
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Call for defense of @decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Call for defense of @decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list