[Python-Dev] Questions about '@' in pep 318
Michael Hudson
mwh at python.net
Fri Aug 6 16:20:52 CEST 2004
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Aug 6 16:20:52 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Questions about '@' in pep 318
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Questions about '@' in pep 318
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Edward K. Ream" <edreamleo at charter.net> writes: >> > annotate.accepts(int, (int,float)) >> >> I don't understand. How are you changing/annotating the function? > > I'm glad you asked. My suggestion was that the compiler turn > > annotate.accepts(int, (int,float)) > > into exactly what it would have turned > > @accepts(int, (int,float)) > > into. I don't like this sort of idea: something that's done by the compiler should *look* like it is being done by the compiler, i.e. be new syntax. Cheers, mwh -- GAG: I think this is perfectly normal behaviour for a Vogon. ... VOGON: That is exactly what you always say. GAG: Well, I think that is probably perfectly normal behaviour for a psychiatrist. -- The Hitch-Hikers Guide to the Galaxy, Episode 9
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Questions about '@' in pep 318
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Questions about '@' in pep 318
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list