[Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
Phillip J. Eby
pje at telecommunity.com
Fri Aug 6 17:21:45 CEST 2004
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Aug 6 17:21:45 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 10:22 AM 8/6/04 +0100, Mark Russell wrote: >On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 03:46, Andrew Durdin wrote: > > 8. When using multiple decorators, each appears on a separate line. > >No, you can put multiple decorators on a single line -- you just need a >newline before the def. From test_decorators.py: > > class C(object): > @funcattrs(abc=1) @staticmethod > def foo(): return 42 > >Probably not good style (but neither is "if cond: stmt" I guess). *shudder* Can we change this? The positive benefits that the @ syntax *does* have, seem completely lost by doing this.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list