[Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
Anthony Baxter
anthony at interlink.com.au
Fri Aug 6 18:18:15 CEST 2004
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Aug 6 18:18:15 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Peters wrote: > [Barry Warsaw] >>... >>In summary, I can definitely sympathize with the concern of tool authors >>who have settled on @ as a meta-character that Python will not use. > > Yup. Having said that, it's quite possible that in the future some other feature will use the @ symbol - I think arrays have been mentioned in the same sense, although presumably not in the sense of @variable meaning "it's an array". So, we either: - explicitly list a symbol that Shall Not Be Used (I favour the unicode glyph for biohazard), or - change the language ref that talks about this to state that although Python currently doesn't use these symbols, this is not stopping a future version of Python from using them for some new feature. Anthony -- Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au> It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list