[Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
Anthony Baxter
anthony at interlink.com.au
Fri Aug 6 18:37:13 CEST 2004
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Aug 6 18:37:13 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Guido van Rossum wrote: >>- change the language ref that talks about this to state that >>although Python currently doesn't use these symbols, this is not >>stopping a future version of Python from using them for some new >>feature. > > > Does that really have to be stated? Isn't this just giving in to the > silly lawyers? A reference manual describes the status quo. How can > it possibly begin to describe future directions? (Except when > reserving certain classes of identifiers like C does.) Beats me. I'm just going from the comments that Edward(?) made that he thought the current wording meant that they'd never be used. Anthony -- Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au> It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list