[Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
"Martin v. Löwis"
martin at v.loewis.de
Fri Aug 6 20:22:41 CEST 2004
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Aug 6 20:22:41 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Guido van Rossum wrote: > Does that really have to be stated? Isn't this just giving in to the > silly lawyers? A reference manual describes the status quo. How can > it possibly begin to describe future directions? However, the Python reference manual became more than a reference manual, as it also talks about what a Python implementation can and cannot do, e.g. for memory management. Providing future directions in the reference manual is a good thing to do if possible as it helps competing implementations and tool vendors. Clearly, people do make assumptions that a documented aspect of the language is not going to change, unless the documentation says that it is likely to change. Regards, Martin
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list