[Python-Dev] Re: def fn (args) [dec,dec]:
Aahz
aahz at pythoncraft.com
Fri Aug 6 22:40:36 CEST 2004
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Aug 6 22:40:36 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: def fn (args) [dec,dec]:
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: def fn (args) [dec,dec]:
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004, Jeremy Hylton wrote: > On Fri, 06 Aug 2004 07:45:51 -0700, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: >> [Anthony] >>> >>> I'm having trouble finding a single piece from you where you >>> outline the problems you have with the [decorators] after args, >>> before :. Could you possibly post a message to python-dev >>> stating your problems with it? It's the major one I've been >>> unable to find your objections to. >> >> And nobody else has expressed their objections to it either? :-) > > I thought it was obvious that this option was not acceptable. It's not obvious to me, but given Guido's concerns, what are the arguments against def foo [deco1(xyz), deco2] (arg1, arg2, *args, **kwargs): Since all functions MUST have a parameter list, everyone knows to keep scanning after the decorators. -- Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "To me vi is Zen. To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is a koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated. You discover truth everytime you use it." --reddy at lion.austin.ibm.com
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: def fn (args) [dec,dec]:
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: def fn (args) [dec,dec]:
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list