[Python-Dev] Re: pre-PEP: Complete, Structured Regular Expression Group Matching
Michael Hudson
mwh at python.net
Sat Aug 7 16:16:09 CEST 2004
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Aug 7 16:16:09 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: pre-PEP: Complete, Structured Regular Expression Group Matching
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: pre-PEP: Complete, Structured Regular Expression Group Matching
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mike Coleman <mkc at mathdogs.com> writes: > Michael Hudson <mwh at python.net> writes: >> Generally, it strikes me as mildly useful. An implementation would >> surely help :-) > > If yours is the most positive review, there probably won't be one. :-) Well, I thought *someone* should say *something*, just to stop the proto-pep being lost. Have you sent it to the PEP editor yet? I think it's ready enough. The reason that I only said "mildly useful" was because I didn't think "OMG! I would so have liked to use this yesterday" or anything like that... > Seriously, though, I'd readily concede that there are different > approaches to solving this problem, and I was hoping for some > feedback and suggestions before I start whacking at the code. I > also have considered the possibility that although this has been > driving me nuts that few others will care--if this is true, it > probably *shouldn't* go in the core libraries. It depends a bit on whether it can be implemented as an addition in a non-painful way, or whether editing the sre code makes it very much easier. I don't know the answer, mind. >>> [mismatch index return] >> I don't really like this idea; it seems to be that it would be more >> helpful to raise an exception and attach this data to the exception. >> But that's a bit inconsisent with how match and search work. > > Hmm. Yeah, if it weren't for the value of matching re.match semantics, it > would make a lot more sense for this to be an exception. As it is, I could > see it going either way. I think you could make a case for raising an exception; the point of structmatch is to extract information, whereas at least sometimes you call re.match just to see if the data matches the pattern. > Or I suppose you could add a flag to determine which (but ugh). Err, let's not go there. Cheers, mwh -- Lisp nearing the age of 50 is the most modern language out there. GC, dynamic, reflective, the best OO model extant including GFs, procedural macros, and the only thing old-fashioned about it is that it is compiled and fast. -- Kenny Tilton, comp.lang.python
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: pre-PEP: Complete, Structured Regular Expression Group Matching
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: pre-PEP: Complete, Structured Regular Expression Group Matching
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list