[Python-Dev] pep 318, Decorators for Functions, Methods and Classes
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Sat Aug 7 23:05:14 CEST 2004
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Aug 7 23:05:14 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] pep 318, Decorators for Functions, Methods and Classes
- Next message: [Python-Dev] pep 318, Decorators for Functions, Methods and Classes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I just wanted to say that I believe it should be allowed to decorate > classes. There's not reason enough (reading the thread linked to by the > PEP) to limit decorators this way. Like said several times in that > thread, metaclasses are harder (to write and to understand) than > decorators. > > Also, considering that you said you would have actually wanted > docstrings above the definition of a function, wouldn't this apply > to classes as well? > > Anyway, it's an artificial limit and it would be better to be able > to test it out during the alpha. Are you volunteering to implement it? --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] pep 318, Decorators for Functions, Methods and Classes
- Next message: [Python-Dev] pep 318, Decorators for Functions, Methods and Classes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list