[Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
"Martin v. Löwis"
martin at v.loewis.de
Sun Aug 8 12:23:49 CEST 2004
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sun Aug 8 12:23:49 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roman Suzi wrote: >>If you don't like the current proposal, try to find objective >>reasons, in addition to the subjective ones. Also, try to come >>up with counter-proposals that are well thought-out, instead of >>being created in a rush. In particular, if all you are concerned >>with is the specific choice of operator, propose a different one. > > > BTW, hat is wrong with my %-proposal: Wrt our discussion: it does not just replace the choice of character; it also replaces the position where the decorators are placed. Taken on its own, it is similar to C2 and C3 in http://www.python.org/moin/PythonDecorators and as such, it shares the same problems. Feel free to add it as C4 if you care. > I want to hear the critics of this as I see this a better syntax > to the decoration needs! Read the Wiki. Regards, Martin
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list