Roman Suzi rnd at onego.ru
Sun Aug 8 15:11:37 CEST 2004

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Sun, 8 Aug 2004, [ISO-8859-1] "Martin v. L?wis" wrote:

>Roman Suzi wrote:
>
>> As for the problems, I do not agree that decorators visually mix with
>> arguments: it is not a problem with +-s and *-s in an expression or other
>> similar cases. Also: heavily decorated function/method probably tells
>> that something is wrong with it's design.
>
>There is another drawback of course: it does not have an implementation.

Well, GvR convinced me decorators-before-def are needed, thus
leaving my proposal void.

However, I am not happy with those @s.

>Regards,
>Martin

Sincerely yours, Roman Suzi
-- 
rnd at onego.ru =\= My AI powered by GNU/Linux RedHat 7.3

---

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list