[Python-Dev] Suggesting '.' decorators (PEP318)
Greg Ewing
greg at cosc.canterbury.ac.nz
Mon Aug 9 04:29:07 CEST 2004
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Aug 9 04:29:07 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Suggesting '.' decorators (PEP318)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Suggesting '.' decorators (PEP318)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Heiko Wundram <heikowu at ceosg.de>: > Same objection from me as to the proposal of decorating with | in > the function: it simply takes away the actual meaning from the > decorator (which actually is to make it very clear to see that the > function is special in some way). I think a problem we have here is that how important it is to know that a function is being decorated depends on the nature of the decorator. For example, it can be important for the user of a function to know that it's a classmethod or staticmethod. On the other hand, the Objective-C signature of a PyObjC method is something that's only of interest to the implementor of the method. So there isn't going to be a one-size-fits-all approach that will give all decorators exactly the right amount of prominence. Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a | Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. | greg at cosc.canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Suggesting '.' decorators (PEP318)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Suggesting '.' decorators (PEP318)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list