[Python-Dev] Re: Re: Re: Call for defense of @decorators
Fredrik Lundh
fredrik at pythonware.com
Tue Aug 10 15:08:53 CEST 2004
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Aug 10 15:08:53 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Skip Montanaro wrote: > I don't think anybody's come up with a candidate keyword that reads well in > most/all situations. Consider: > > make accepts(int, (int, float)) > make returns(int) > def foo(arg1, arg2): > return arg1 * arg2 how about "at", pronounced "annotation type" ? (duck) </F>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list