[Python-Dev] Classes that claim to be defined in __builtin__ but aren't
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Tue Aug 10 17:01:17 CEST 2004
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Tue Aug 10 17:01:17 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Classes that claim to be defined in __builtin__ but aren't
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Classes that claim to be defined in __builtin__ but aren't
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Well, it's already there, but types.GeneratorType.__name__ is > 'generator'... it could be changed to 'GeneratorType', I guess. No, no, no! The "new" convention for built-in type names is all lowercase. CamelCaseType is old and only used in the context of types.py. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Classes that claim to be defined in __builtin__ but aren't
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Classes that claim to be defined in __builtin__ but aren't
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list