[Python-Dev] @decorator now w/ class support [was: pep 318, Decorators for Functions, Methods and Classes]
Jack Diederich
jack at performancedrivers.com
Thu Aug 12 17:03:54 CEST 2004
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Thu Aug 12 17:03:54 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] pep 318, Decorators for Functions, Methods and Classes
- Next message: [Python-Dev] @decorator now w/ class support [was: pep 318, Decorators for Functions, Methods and Classes]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 11:39:35AM +0100, Michael Hudson wrote: > "Phillip J. Eby" <pje at telecommunity.com> writes: > > > At 03:44 PM 8/11/04 -0400, Jack Diederich wrote: > >> I have a mostly working patch for class decorators but it gets an > >> XXX ambiguity > >>between > >> > >>funcdef: [decorators] 'def' NAME parameters ':' suite > >>and > >>classdef: [decorators] 'class' NAME [ '(' testlist ')' ] ':' suite > >> > >> It works as advertised with the pre-decorators funcdef definition > >> (which removes the ambiguity). > >>Help? > > > > > > How about this? > > > > decorated_assignment: [decorators] (funcdef | classdef) > > decorated_definition or something would be better surely? I ended up going with 'decorated_thing' http://python.org/sf/1007991 decorator code moved out of the function code and will decorate both functions and classes. -Jack
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] pep 318, Decorators for Functions, Methods and Classes
- Next message: [Python-Dev] @decorator now w/ class support [was: pep 318, Decorators for Functions, Methods and Classes]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list