[Python-Dev] PEP 318: Can't we all just get along?
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Fri Aug 20 02:07:36 CEST 2004
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Fri Aug 20 02:07:36 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 318: Can't we all just get along?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 318: Can't we all just get along?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I agree with Gareth on both of his main points: I didn't buy Guido's > rejection of list-after-def (and so argued against his points in > another thread here); but the decorator suite before the def (J2) is > quite nice also, and it doesn't hide the def when there are lots of > decorators (due to the indentation). I would strongly support either > proposal over the current @decorators. So pick a favorite already and argue with the folks on c.l.py about which one will be presented to me. I'm serious. I don't want a hundred people arguing their separate points with me. If that's all I get the current syntax stays. If the community can *agree* on something they can support, I will listen. But it has to be a unified voice. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 318: Can't we all just get along?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 318: Can't we all just get along?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list