[Python-Dev] Ignoring SIGPIPE (was: [Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Modules socketmodule.c, 1.298, 1.299)
Neal Norwitz
neal at metaslash.com
Sat Aug 21 01:40:05 CEST 2004
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sat Aug 21 01:40:05 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: [Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Modules socketmodule.c, 1.298, 1.299
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Ignoring SIGPIPE (was: [Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Modules socketmodule.c, 1.298, 1.299)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 03:06:21PM +1000, Dave Cole wrote: > Andrew McNamara wrote: > >>>Patch #1003700: Add socketpair function to socket module. > >> > >>The docstring (below) states the arguments are the same as socket(). > >>However, in sock_initobj() line 2496, the family is initialized to > >>AF_INET. I think the #if defined(AF_UNIX) code above should be > >>removed and family should be initialized to AF_INET. > > > >I talked Dave into this - AF_UNIX is typically the only address family > >that is valid for socketpair(). Using AF_INET under linux and OS X > >results in EOPNOTSUPP. > > Would a change to the documentation and docstring be sufficient it it > explained that the default family is AF_UNIX if defined for the > platform, AF_INET otherwise? That would make me happy. I just don't want the doc/docstring to lie. I don't have a problem with it defaulting to AF_UNIX. > >>I don't think the #ifdef SIGPIPE code is correct. If the user > >>installed a signal handler calling signal() will remove it. I > >>think the call to signal() should be removed. > > > >I agree, but I think that was copied verbatim from elsewhere in > >socketmodule.c, so it was left with the aim of being bug for bug > >compatible with socket.socket(). > > Indeed. I was not going to change something as fundamental as the > existing signal handling. The onyl sensible thing to do was to copy the > behaviour already in place when you create a socket the "normal" way. You are correct. There are two places that call signal(SIGPIPE, SIG_IGN); I find this surprising. Guido, you added this code in version 1.4 from 1991. You do remember the reason why, don't you? It's only 13 years ago. :-) I'm hesitant to remove the old calls, but I'm not sure I want it added to new calls if it's not necessary. Any opinions? Neal
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: [Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Modules socketmodule.c, 1.298, 1.299
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Ignoring SIGPIPE (was: [Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Modules socketmodule.c, 1.298, 1.299)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list