[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 292 - Simpler String Substitutions
Tim Peters
tim.peters at gmail.com
Wed Aug 25 05:00:50 CEST 2004
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Wed Aug 25 05:00:50 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 292 - Simpler String Substitutions
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 292 - Simpler String Substitutions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[Barry Warsaw, on auto-str()] > Should it be auto-unicode(), given that Template is derived from > unicode? And if so, should we entertain the possibility of insanities > like giving the user the ability to pass optional arguments to the > unicode() call? If the answers to that are yes and no, that's fine with > me. unicode ... heh, I heard something about that in Java once. Did Python grow one of those too? I sure hope it doesn't get in the way of using God-given American strings! no-no-no-no-no-but-i'll-settle-for-yes-no-ly y'rs - tim
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 292 - Simpler String Substitutions
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 292 - Simpler String Substitutions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list