[Python-Dev] Re: Alternative Implementation for PEP 292: Simple String Substitutions
Guido van Rossum
gvanrossum at gmail.com
Sun Aug 29 19:37:30 CEST 2004
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Sun Aug 29 19:37:30 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Alternative Implementation for PEP 292: Simple String Substitutions
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP-0273 (zip imports) needs to be finished off
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> As a test case, how would I implement the case that has come up here > recently, of supporting $obj.attr substitutions, in each of the two > implementations? It would be interesting to see the relative > simplicity. I'm assuming that the function-based case would require > effectively a cut & paste reimplementation. > > [FX: Dives into source code...] > The Template class is pretty trivial, but it doesn't seem to be > designed for extension. Thus, the above test case would *still* need > pretty much a rewrite. However, if the Template class was rewritten > with overriding in mind, it probably could make things easier: Subclassing is only one possibility. With the templating version, you could also write another class that implements the same interface -- very Pythonic. If Raymond's function approach were chosen, you're stuck with what that function can and can't do. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Alternative Implementation for PEP 292: Simple String Substitutions
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP-0273 (zip imports) needs to be finished off
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list