[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 318 & Community Consensus
David Goodger
goodger at python.org
Mon Aug 30 18:05:42 CEST 2004
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list
Mon Aug 30 18:05:42 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 318 & Community Consensus
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: [Python-checkins] python/nondist/peps pep-0318.txt, 1.28, 1.29
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[Fredrik Lundh] > David Goodger wrote: >> It may confuse users who don't expect a block to contain bare >> expressions. > > blocks can contain bare expressions today, and such > expressions are evaluated, but the results are discarded. > plain function calls belong to this category, for example. Corrected in CVS & on the web. >> On the other hand, the ``@`` syntax is bound to cause at least as >> much confusion. > > and that qualifies as an unbiased observation in exactly in what > way? Perhaps in trying to balance the text I overshot. Removed. -- David Goodger <http://python.net/~goodger> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 253 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20040830/97d3134a/signature.pgp
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 318 & Community Consensus
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: [Python-checkins] python/nondist/peps pep-0318.txt, 1.28, 1.29
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list